Incoming restrictions on the administrative judge's exercise of his procedural Role (A comparative study

Main Article Content

Ahmed Salman Swadi
amer zghair mohaisen

Abstract

Despite the wide powers that the administrative judge enjoys in searching for and evaluating evidence, it is not an absolute matter, as his procedural role is subject to a set of restrictions or controls that regulate him like that of an ordinary judge and in proportion to his judicial job. His procedures in the case cannot be accepted unless a number of conditions are met, which are conditions for the validity of his procedural role. However extensive the role of the administrative judge is and his freedom to prove and investigate the case, he remains resstricted by the nature of his judicial function, which obliges him to account the general principles associated with the principles of litigation in terms of his commitment to the principle of confrontation, and taking into account the appropriateness of the means of proof for the nature of the administrative dispute, as well as his obligation to prepare the case in full preparation, and in the sense that establishing evidence is the concern of the litigants in the lawsuit, so he should take into account their right to prove and discuss the evidence presented in the lawsuit 

Article Details

How to Cite
أحمد سلمان سوادي, & عامر زغير محيسن. (2022). Incoming restrictions on the administrative judge’s exercise of his procedural Role (A comparative study. MIsan Journal of Comparative Legal Studies, 1(5), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.61266/mjcls.v1i5.81
Section
Articles