The Plea for the Unconstitutionality of Administrative Systems Compared to the Plea for their Illegality in the Light of Jordanian Legislations (Comparative study)

Main Article Content

Hiba Abdul Mutalib
Hamad Munshid Enad

Abstract

The defense of unconstitutionality is a way to protect the principle of the supremacy of the constitution and achieve the public interest. In this study, we will address the defense of the unconstitutionality of systems in light of the Jordanian Constitutional Court Law No. 15 of 2012 and compare it with the defense of the illegality of systems in light of the Jordanian Administrative Judiciary Law No. 27 of 2014 to explore the problems included in both laws and to know which defense achieves better results in the public interest, because the plea for the unconstitutionality of administrative systems is an indirect appeal, but it is raised on the occasion of a dispute or an existing case. While the plea for unconstitutionality is raised at any stage of the case, whether at the stage of appeal or discrimination, the plea for illegality, it must be submitted during the appeal period stipulated in the Jordanian Administrative Judiciary Law 

Article Details

How to Cite
هبة عبد المطلب الفضلي, & حمد منشد عناد. (2022). The Plea for the Unconstitutionality of Administrative Systems Compared to the Plea for their Illegality in the Light of Jordanian Legislations (Comparative study). MIsan Journal of Comparative Legal Studies, 1(5), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.61266/mjcls.v1i5.84
Section
Articles